I had a great time at the Green Living show this weekend. It’s a rare treat to spend eight hours or so meeting dozens of people who are dedicating their lives to a healthier way of life. It’s a show of good ideas, whether you’re talking to the farmer who produces organic milk, the inventor of the energy recovery device or someone from a local community food centre who’s cooking up gournet nibblies from local food alongside the some of the city’s celebrity chefs.
As fantastic as all the ideas and initiatives were, I’d been set up for the day with an urgent reminder. I got to the show just in time to hear Stephen Lewis speak on climate change and its health effects. As is typical of his style, I think, Lewis promptly woke us up from our green living daydream. “All of the hybrid cars in the world, and shows like this… will never collectively prevent and environmental disaster,” Lewis said, calling it a “monumental delusion” to think that these inclinations will prevent global warming.
Lewis went on to say that global warming events, from creeping shorelines to tsunamis, loss of habitat to crop failure to water shortages to millions of displaced environmental refugees are beginning to take a major toll on our resources. To prevent global conflict and massive suffering from the health effects of climate change, we have to act immediately to massively reduce our carbon output – on the order of 70 to 90 per cent by 2030.
I usually put habitat protection and diversity of species first when I’m thinking of the environment, thanks to my love for the natural beauty of the Thousand Islands, where I grew up. But here’s Lewis telling me that I have to put global carbon output first, because everything I love hinges on that. It’s hard not to turn away from such a complex, global problem. Lewis says we have to act, and that means pushing for political change, now. He is hoping that the next UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen this October will bring major change, but after seeing the emotional highs and lows around the Kyoto accord, it’s not enough to cross our fingers over one event. We’re going to have to ask for more, now, from all levels of government.
How should governments deal with the carbon problem? Stop looking for one perfect solution. “I suspect it will take a mix of a carbon tax, carbon cap and trade and sequestration,” said Lewis. And, he said, we have to look at nuclear energy, “in a dispassionate and clinical way.”
Lewis’s talk might sound discouraging, but it wasn’t, really. He’s right, I’ll have to try to contact political changemakers about making carbon reduction top priority. But I do hope that that means opportunity for green jobs, for invention, for putting value back on our natural world, not as a “resource”, but as a refuge. And Lewis left me with one centralizing idea against which I can measure my green living decisions. It’s all about the carbon output.
Have you contacted your municipal, provincial or federal representatives about making change in your community? What happened when you did?